Some well-defined numbers are larger than TREE( 3 ) and Graham’s number, e.g. SSCG(3), SCG(13), Lader number, Rayos number, and Fish number 7. Some functions without a specific popular number grow faster than TREE(n) and g(n), e.g. Buchholz Hydra function, Busy Beaver function Σ(n) and Xi function.
Is there a number greater than SSCG 3?
Some well-defined numbers are larger than TREE(3) and Graham’s number, e.g. SSCG(3), SCG(13), number of feeders, number of rayos and number of fish 7. Some functions without a specific popular number grow faster than TREE(n) and g(n), e.g. Buchholz Hydra function, Busy Beaver function Σ(n) and Xi function.
How much larger is tree 3 than Graham’s number?
This can be explained in a single paragraph. In terms of FGH Wikipedia’s fast growth hierarchy, the magnitude of the Grahams number is comparable to fω + 1. TREE(3) is not only larger than the Grahams number, it’s a number on an absolutely different scale.
Is there a tree 4?
Although there are few known results, viz. H. proven statements about the lower bounds of trees, a famous Japanese mathematician, T. Kihara, confirmed that Baum(4) is larger than Graham’s number.
Is the Googolplexianth greater than Graham’s number?
Originally Answered: Which is higher, Graham’s number or a googolplex? Googolplex cannot even be compared to the magnitude of Graham’s number. It’s only 10^100 digits, while Graham’s number is much higher only on the 2nd iteration of 64.
What is greater than Graham’s number?
You have a googol that is 10¹⁰⁰. And a Googolplex, which is 10 to the power of Googol, or: Then there’s another Googolplexian: There’s an extremely large number called Graham’s number.
How big is Googolplexianth?
A googol consists of 101 digits. It eclipses a billion, which only has 10 digits. These are not million numbers, No No NO! Numbers in millions have 7 or 8 digits.
How much larger is tree3 than Graham’s number?
TREE (3) is not only larger than Graham’s number, it is a number of a different order of magnitude.